Discussion about this post

User's avatar
michael burgwin's avatar

I am a terrain theory anti-virus anti-vaxxer who believes that in the current global zeitgeist trying to push the there-is-no-virus worldview is not a good strategic effort. In fact, right now, it could be considered controlled opposition. As I see it, the main objective right now is to "call the question" which is what CHD / RFK jr, ICAN / Bigree and Aaron Siri are doing in smaller tactical steps via the courts, in particular. With each "win" they indirectly remove another brick from the germ theory edifice without attacking that worldview directly / head-on. Meanwhile, the anti-virus terrain crowd undermines that effort by its divisiveness. The shared opposition of anti-CV-19 / pro-safe vaxx (a brilliant cover when they know that in court the "sceince" will not survive discovery) will ultimately lead back to Duesberg et al and the crud-science of assuming virus before eliminating other factors, as well as the challenge (impossibillty) of testing with a pure aka isolated virus which then, of course, sets the stage for terrain theory to explode out of the cake in the middle of the wedding.

Expand full comment
Truth Serum's avatar

Colds and flus are real. Have you read the Real Anthony Fauci? Gain of function research involved mixing cold and flu viruses with other ingredients to make them more virulent. That's what C19 is. So I don't think that going down this route is useful overall for getting accountability for those who pushed the jab and benefitted financially from this "pandemic". Not helpful.

Expand full comment
171 more comments...

No posts